| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 |
981. Commander Aze For CSM 11 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
commander aze wrote: then citadel wars. you are right they need to be longer to fit all the timers but what if the defense wins the first timer? or the second timer. should the war continue of there is no hope of finishing in the time frame. Wi...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 20:16:15
|
982. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
KickAss Tivianne wrote: I am not saying make freighters immune to bumping... Where Did I say that? They can be bumped for a while, but there comes a point when its just harassment and maybe they don't even have a gank fleet out. You called f...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 18:50:22
|
983. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jennifer en Marland wrote: It seems silly and nonsensical that almost every method of tackling a neutral ship in highsec will get you concorded...but bumping allows you to indefinitely stop a freighter warping with no penalty. Even if this con...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 16:25:28
|
984. Commander Aze For CSM 11 - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
commander aze wrote: Giving an incentive for defense to actually fight back is key to making the mechanic worthwhile. Eve is a game of internet spaceships and I think CCP Guard said it best[ "Killing is just a means of communication" CCP Guar...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 11:17:14
|
985. AG Battles, adventures and derringGÇôdo - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Ozzie Udan wrote: For the fleet that saved the freighter on the night i speak off was a real victory, you must understand(or maybe you don't) how hard it is to stop a gank fleet in its tracks, a fleet that was put together knowing our numbers a...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 09:22:37
|
986. Balancing bumping and looting mechanics - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
KickAss Tivianne wrote: Solutions... there have been a number in posts in the forums and Redit that have solutions to this problem. This includes an "emergency macro jump drive" concept, or after so much shield to shield contact to a freighter ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.26 08:31:44
|
987. AG Battles, adventures and derringGÇôdo - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Desire Eginald wrote: Sure you all know what you're talking about but I do like the fact that Code. are failing more and more, it's not fun being ganked and losing your stuff then have the **** taken to, What ever form anti-code comes in I'll...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.25 14:16:58
|
988. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gneeznow wrote: Every corp over 10 people in empire gets decced into oblivion, and these newbies have to face station huggers at every hub in brick tank Proteus they have no chance of killing. and then you people wonder why your game is dying. ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.25 12:16:38
|
989. High Sec Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Lorelei Ierendi wrote: What type of CSM member would I be? Good question. I am in favor of dynamism, as it were. Of this I am glad. I have one final question for you. The latest minor controversy du jour is over the impact of the new Sk...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.24 10:33:29
|
990. High Sec Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Do you share my concerns, or do you think I am off-base here? Well... I do not think you are off base. But wealth distribution in EVE is a big subject... High Sec incursions are theoretically av...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.22 09:08:10
|
991. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: SurrenderMonkey wrote: Lann Shahni wrote: okay will bite, you postet this https://public-crest.eveonline.com/wars/
it's not realy in fomat easy to read, do you have a link to traslator or reader? It's in JSON ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.21 16:41:44
|
992. Terandria Starsong for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
A couple questions: Terandria Starsong wrote: 2) Either a new BS sized mining vessel, perhaps a tech 3 version so as not to replace exumers. 3) The possibility of giving the Rorqual a new role, of being able to mine itself. Perhaps having the...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.21 14:33:59
|
993. The Morning I anti-ganked - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
DrysonBennington wrote: Not certain if Command Destroyers are able to use the Micro Jump Drive Generator in High Sec or not. If so then there is the answer to defeating CODE. Simply warp the ship being bumped away when the bump ship makes its o...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.21 07:41:34
|
994. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: But unlike baseball the rules in eve dos not provide an equal playing feild, Baseball dos not repeatedly match a little league team against the grand slam champs! No it does not. Eve is set in a hyper-capitalistic, dystopian...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.20 17:03:21
|
995. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rico Sabezan wrote: I get the reasoning behind wardecs. High sec ,safety ,carebears , content ,blah blah blah. But when they are non stop, it makes being in a corp unplayable. There should atleast be a cool down between non mutual wars to give ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.20 16:11:58
|
996. High Sec Candidate - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Lorelei Ierendi wrote: Black Pedro wrote: Isn't that the point? There a significant group of players who claim they run highsec Incursions not because the enjoy them, but because it has one of the highest ISK/hr in the game and comes with es...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.20 06:12:58
|
997. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: i do again partially agree, player interaction through wars is important, i just feel the current is realy one sided, and belive that changing the wardec system to give more leeway to small and starting corporations, will a...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.19 15:46:37
|
998. DomanarK for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
DomanarK wrote: -10 security standing pilots are wanted criminals and should be treated as such! Not being able to dock in high-sec stations should be implemented. The current system has the faction police looking less effective than a group o...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.19 09:51:30
|
999. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Lann Shahni wrote: I suggest increasing the ridiculously low cost of starting a war from 50 mil to 500mil, and maintaining 50 mil a week for keeping it up! 500 mil is probably too high, nobody would get wardecced ...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.19 09:20:04
|
1000. Wardec balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lann Shahni wrote: Back in 2003 when eve startet 50 mil was a lot of money, so if you decalarede war, it was because you had real bone to pick! To day far most wars are meaningless, large well preparede pvp corps attacking small defence less co...
- by Black Pedro - at 2016.01.18 06:46:15
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |